[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14f3bee7569f229541852f61f0a1a88fcdec7249.camel@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 16:34:05 -0700
From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Random shadow stack pointer corruption
On Sat, 2020-07-18 at 15:41 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 7/18/20 11:24 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-07-18 at 11:00 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 10:58 AM Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > My shadow stack tests start to have random shadow stack pointer corruption after
> > > > v5.7 (excluding). The symptom looks like some locking issue or the kernel is
> > > > confused about which CPU a task is on. In later tip/master, this can be
> > > > triggered by creating two tasks and each does continuous
> > > > pthread_create()/pthread_join(). If the kernel has max_cpus=1, the issue goes
> > > > away. I also checked XSAVES/XRSTORS, but this does not seem to be an issue
> > > > coming from there.
> > >
> > > What do you mean "shadow stack pointer corruption"? Is SSP itself
> > > corrupt while running in the kernel? Is one of the MSRs getting
> > > corrupted? Is the memory to which the shadow stack points getting
> > > corrupted? Is the CPU rejecting an attempt to change SSP?
> >
> > What I see is, a new thread after ret_from_fork() and iret back to ring-3,
> > its shadow stack pointer (MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP) is corrupted.
>
> Does corrupt mean random? Or is it a valid stack address, just not for
> _this_ thread? Or NULL? Or is it a kernel address? Have you tried
> tracing *ALL* the WRMSR's and XRSTOR's that write to the MSR?
When a shadow stack address is changed, the address appears to be other task's.
I traced all WRMSR's and XRSTOR's. I also verified there have not been any
XRSTORS from a wrong buffer. When rc6 is tagged, I will re-base, test, and
share current patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists