linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH for v5.9] sch_cake: Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200719.151757.18086897439312800.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sun, 19 Jul 2020 15:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     grandmaster@...klimov.de
Cc:     toke@...e.dk, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        jiri@...nulli.us, kuba@...nel.org, cake@...ts.bufferbloat.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for v5.9] sch_cake: Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones

Please don't do this "for v5.9" stuff.

There is no precendence for this and it looks like -stable patch
series to just about anyone.

There are well defined, established, ways to write Subject lines for
proper patch submissions.

Please do not invent your own way of doing this.  It is very
frustrating for me personally, especially with the amount of
patches I have to process and review, to watch how you wildly
change your patch submission formatting over and over again.

Just do what other developers are doing and you'll be fine.  Don't
invent your own way.

I'm ignoring all of your "for v5.9" formatted patches, sorry.

Thanks.