linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.7 224/244] drm/amdgpu/powerplay: Modify SMC message name for setting power profile mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200720152836.505811922@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 17:38:15 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, chen gong <curry.gong@....com>,
        Evan Quan <evan.quan@....com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.7 224/244] drm/amdgpu/powerplay: Modify SMC message name for setting power profile mode

From: chen gong <curry.gong@....com>

commit 98a34cf931e848f8489d3fb15a8f5fc03802ad65 upstream.

I consulted Cai Land(Chuntian.Cai@....com), he told me corresponding smc
message name to fSMC_MSG_SetWorkloadMask() is
"PPSMC_MSG_ActiveProcessNotify" in firmware code of Renoir.

Strange though it may seem, but it's a fact.

Signed-off-by: chen gong <curry.gong@....com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@....com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/renoir_ppt.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/renoir_ppt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/renoir_ppt.c
@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ static int renoir_set_power_profile_mode
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	ret = smu_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu, SMU_MSG_SetWorkloadMask,
+	ret = smu_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu, SMU_MSG_ActiveProcessNotify,
 				    1 << workload_type,
 				    NULL);
 	if (ret) {