[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200720153706.440b86b5@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:37:06 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
Hi all,
On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 13:50:12 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 12:33:01 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:54:59 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:37:00 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > > > failed like this:
> > > >
> > > > ERROR: modpost: "sched_setscheduler" [kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.ko] undefined!
> > > >
> > > > Caused by commit
> > > >
> > > > 616d91b68cd5 ("sched: Remove sched_setscheduler*() EXPORTs")
> > > >
> > > > Missed one :-)
> > > >
> > > > I have reverted that commit for today.
> > >
> > > I am still reverting that commit.
> >
> > Ditto ...
>
> Ping?
OK, it has now been three weeks ... I must admit I was a little
suprised that initial testing of the tip tree (or even the branch that
this commit is on) did not pick this up.
Unless there is something really weird going on here, Linus will notice
if you try to get him to pull this as he tests with an x86_64
allmodconfig build.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists