linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.7 034/244] drm/exynos: Properly propagate return value in drm_iommu_attach

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 17:35:05 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.7 034/244] drm/exynos: Properly propagate return value in drm_iommu_attach_device()

From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>

[ Upstream commit b9c633882de4601015625f9136f248e9abca8a7a ]

Propagate the proper error codes from the called functions instead of
unconditionally returning 0.

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Merge conflict so merged it manually.
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dma.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dma.c
index 619f81435c1b2..58b89ec11b0eb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dma.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int drm_iommu_attach_device(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
 				struct device *subdrv_dev, void **dma_priv)
 {
 	struct exynos_drm_private *priv = drm_dev->dev_private;
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (get_dma_ops(priv->dma_dev) != get_dma_ops(subdrv_dev)) {
 		DRM_DEV_ERROR(subdrv_dev, "Device %s lacks support for IOMMU\n",
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int drm_iommu_attach_device(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
 	if (ret)
 		clear_dma_max_seg_size(subdrv_dev);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.25.1