[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200720152805.933322350@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 17:36:39 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 060/125] arm64: alternative: Use true and false for boolean values
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
[ Upstream commit 3c4d9137eefecf273a520d392071ffc9df0a9a7a ]
Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
instead of an integer value. This code was detected with the help of
Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
index 5c4bce4ac381a..b9045d8d05d88 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -47,11 +47,11 @@ static bool branch_insn_requires_update(struct alt_instr *alt, unsigned long pc)
unsigned long replptr;
if (kernel_text_address(pc))
- return 1;
+ return true;
replptr = (unsigned long)ALT_REPL_PTR(alt);
if (pc >= replptr && pc <= (replptr + alt->alt_len))
- return 0;
+ return false;
/*
* Branching into *another* alternate sequence is doomed, and
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists