linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v4 02/12] security: add ipe lsm evaluation loop and audit system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f7cda924-a14d-35bf-7c00-f12e2be9844c@linux.microsoft.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:44:01 -0700
From:   Deven Bowers <deven.desai@...ux.microsoft.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, agk@...hat.com,
        axboe@...nel.dk, snitzer@...hat.com, jmorris@...ei.org,
        serge@...lyn.com, zohar@...ux.ibm.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        paul@...l-moore.com, eparis@...hat.com, jannh@...gle.com,
        dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-audit@...hat.com
Cc:     tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        corbet@....net, sashal@...nel.org,
        jaskarankhurana@...ux.microsoft.com, mdsakib@...rosoft.com,
        nramas@...ux.microsoft.com, pasha.tatshin@...een.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 02/12] security: add ipe lsm evaluation loop and
 audit system



On 7/17/2020 4:16 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 7/17/20 4:09 PM, Deven Bowers wrote:
>> +config SECURITY_IPE_PERMISSIVE_SWITCH
>> +	bool "Enable the ability to switch IPE to permissive mode"
>> +	default y
>> +	help
>> +	  This option enables two ways of switching IPE to permissive mode,
>> +	  a sysctl (if enabled), `ipe.enforce`, or a kernel command line
>> +	  parameter, `ipe.enforce`. If either of these are set to 0, files
> 
> 	                                               is set

Thanks, I'll change it in the next iteration.

> 
>> +	  will be subject to IPE's policy, audit messages will be logged, but
>> +	  the policy will not be enforced.
>> +
>> +	  If unsure, answer Y.
> 
>