[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7397069-e22b-a921-132c-144ee3a07580@broadcom.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 10:40:16 -0700
From: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
To: Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@...adcom.com>,
Dhananjay Phadke <dphadke@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: iproc: fix race between client unreg and isr
looks good.
On 2020-07-19 12:59 a.m., Rayagonda Kokatanur wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 5:10 AM Dhananjay Phadke
> <dphadke@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>> When i2c client unregisters, synchronize irq before setting
>> iproc_i2c->slave to NULL.
>>
>> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000318
>>
>> [ 371.020421] pc : bcm_iproc_i2c_isr+0x530/0x11f0
>> [ 371.025098] lr : __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x6c/0x170
>> [ 371.030309] sp : ffff800010003e40
>> [ 371.033727] x29: ffff800010003e40 x28: 0000000000000060
>> [ 371.039206] x27: ffff800010ca9de0 x26: ffff800010f895df
>> [ 371.044686] x25: ffff800010f18888 x24: ffff0008f7ff3600
>> [ 371.050165] x23: 0000000000000003 x22: 0000000001600000
>> [ 371.055645] x21: ffff800010f18888 x20: 0000000001600000
>> [ 371.061124] x19: ffff0008f726f080 x18: 0000000000000000
>> [ 371.066603] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
>> [ 371.072082] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000
>> [ 371.077561] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000001
>> [ 371.083040] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000040
>> [ 371.088519] x9 : ffff800010f317c8 x8 : ffff800010f317c0
>> [ 371.093999] x7 : ffff0008f805b3b0 x6 : 0000000000000000
>> [ 371.099478] x5 : ffff0008f7ff36a4 x4 : ffff8008ee43d000
>> [ 371.104957] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : ffff8000107d64c0
>> [ 371.110436] x1 : 00000000c00000af x0 : 0000000000000000
>>
>> [ 371.115916] Call trace:
>> [ 371.118439] bcm_iproc_i2c_isr+0x530/0x11f0
>> [ 371.122754] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x6c/0x170
>> [ 371.127606] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x34/0x88
>> [ 371.132189] handle_irq_event+0x40/0x120
>> [ 371.136234] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xcc/0x1a0
>> [ 371.140459] generic_handle_irq+0x24/0x38
>> [ 371.144594] __handle_domain_irq+0x60/0xb8
>> [ 371.148820] gic_handle_irq+0xc0/0x158
>> [ 371.152687] el1_irq+0xb8/0x140
>> [ 371.155927] arch_cpu_idle+0x10/0x18
>> [ 371.159615] do_idle+0x204/0x290
>> [ 371.162943] cpu_startup_entry+0x24/0x60
>> [ 371.166990] rest_init+0xb0/0xbc
>> [ 371.170322] arch_call_rest_init+0xc/0x14
>> [ 371.174458] start_kernel+0x404/0x430
>>
>> Fixes: c245d94ed106 ("i2c: iproc: Add multi byte read-write support for slave mode")
>> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Phadke <dphadke@...ux.microsoft.com>
Acked-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-iproc.c | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-iproc.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-iproc.c
>> index b58224b7b..37d2a79e7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-iproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-iproc.c
>> @@ -1074,14 +1074,15 @@ static int bcm_iproc_i2c_unreg_slave(struct i2c_client *slave)
>> if (!iproc_i2c->slave)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - iproc_i2c->slave = NULL;
>> -
>> /* disable all slave interrupts */
>> tmp = iproc_i2c_rd_reg(iproc_i2c, IE_OFFSET);
>> tmp &= ~(IE_S_ALL_INTERRUPT_MASK <<
>> IE_S_ALL_INTERRUPT_SHIFT);
>> iproc_i2c_wr_reg(iproc_i2c, IE_OFFSET, tmp);
>>
>> + synchronize_irq(iproc_i2c->irq);
>> + iproc_i2c->slave = NULL;
>> +
>> /* Erase the slave address programmed */
>> tmp = iproc_i2c_rd_reg(iproc_i2c, S_CFG_SMBUS_ADDR_OFFSET);
>> tmp &= ~BIT(S_CFG_EN_NIC_SMB_ADDR3_SHIFT);
> Looks good to me. Thank you for the patch.
> Reviewed-by: Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@...adcom.com>
>
> Regards,
> Rayagonda
Powered by blists - more mailing lists