lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 19:11:07 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/24] fs: move the putname from filename_lookup to the
 callers

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 05:58:43PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This allows reusing the struct filename for retries, and will also allow
> pushing the getname up the stack for a few places to allower for better
> handling of kernel space filenames.

You are complicating the callers for no good reason.  NAK.  The same goes
for the previous patch in the series.

Keep the cleanup rules simple.  Sure, I understand wanting to avoid
special rules for early bootstrap, but that's a corner case; don't
make fs/namei.c harder to follow.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ