linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v15 7/9] nvmet-passthru: Add passthru code to process commands

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b395c041-9ecf-4239-2cc2-4ecbfe2a550d@grimberg.me>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 16:15:31 -0700
From:   Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com>,
        Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 7/9] nvmet-passthru: Add passthru code to process
 commands


>>> Thanks for the review Christoph. I think I should be able to make all
>>> the requested changes in the next week or two.
>>>
>>> On 2020-07-20 1:35 p.m., Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm still not so happy about having to look up the namespace and still
>>>>> wonder if we should generalize the connect_q to a passthrough_q.  But
>>>>> I guess we can do that later and then reduce some of the exports here..
>>>>
>>>> That is a neat idea! should be easy to do (and we can then lose the host
>>>> xarray stuff). I don't mind having it on a later patch, but it should be
>>>> easy enough to do even before...
>>>>
>>>
>>> I sort of follow this. I can try to work something up but it will
>>> probably take me a few iterations to get it to where you want it. So,
>>> roughly, we'd create a passthrough_q in core with the controller's IO
>>> tagset and then cleanup the fabrics hosts to use that instead of each
>>> independently creating their connect_q?
>>>
>>> Though, I don't understand how this relates to the host xarray stuff
>>> that Sagi mentioned...
>>
>> passthru commands are in essence REQ_OP_DRV_IN/REQ_OP_DRV_OUT, which
>> means that the driver shouldn't need the ns at all. So if you have a
>> dedicated request queue (mapped to the I/O tagset), you don't need the
>> ns->queue and we can lose the ns lookup altogether.
> 
> Thanks, that helps clarify things a bit, but which xarray were you
> talking about?

The patch from Chaitanya

See "[PATCH V4 2/2] nvme-core: use xarray for ctrl ns tracking"