linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add common TI SCI rproc bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4968835e-2ba5-dcd8-93b9-c3e33aabb0a9@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 18:26:26 -0500
From:   Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add common TI SCI rproc
 bindings

On 7/20/20 5:17 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:47:57 -0500, Suman Anna wrote:
>> Add a bindings document that lists the common TI SCI properties
>> used by the K3 R5F and DSP remoteproc devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
>> ---
>> v4: Addressed both of Rob's review comments on ti,sci-proc-ids property
>> v3: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11602317/
>>
>>   .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml   | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml
>>
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Rob,

You seem to have added your Reviewed-by tag by mistake on this 
particular patch [1], that's why I actually dropped it.

I do use pwclient, so the tags do get picked up automatically for my 
newer versions.

regards
Suman

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/comment/23484127/