[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200720073719.GA458916@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:37:19 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 03:25:22PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/iio/magnetometer/ak8974.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 0187294d227d ("iio: magnetometer: ak8974: Fix runtime PM imbalance on error")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> d3be83244c7d ("iio: remove explicit IIO device parent assignment")
>
> from the staging tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc drivers/iio/magnetometer/ak8974.c
> index 91c39352fba2,c2260c84f7f1..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/iio/magnetometer/ak8974.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/magnetometer/ak8974.c
> @@@ -890,10 -884,14 +890,9 @@@ static int ak8974_probe(struct i2c_clie
> ret = ak8974_reset(ak8974);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&i2c->dev, "AK8974 reset failed\n");
> - goto power_off;
> + goto disable_pm;
> }
>
> - indio_dev->dev.parent = &i2c->dev;
> - pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&i2c->dev,
> - AK8974_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY);
> - pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&i2c->dev);
> - pm_runtime_put(&i2c->dev);
> -
> switch (ak8974->variant) {
> case AK8974_WHOAMI_VALUE_AMI306:
> case AK8974_WHOAMI_VALUE_AMI305:
Looks good to me, thanks, I've now done this same thing to my tree as I
have merged with v5.8-rc6.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists