[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200720075148.172156-12-hch@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:51:45 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/14] mm: use SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO more intelligently
There is no point in trying to call bdev_read_page if SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO
is not set, as the device won't support it. Also there is no point in
trying a bio submission if bdev_read_page failed.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
mm/page_io.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_io.c b/mm/page_io.c
index ccda7679008851..63b44b8221af0f 100644
--- a/mm/page_io.c
+++ b/mm/page_io.c
@@ -403,8 +403,11 @@ int swap_readpage(struct page *page, bool synchronous)
goto out;
}
- ret = bdev_read_page(sis->bdev, swap_page_sector(page), page);
- if (!ret) {
+ if (sis->flags & SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO) {
+ ret = bdev_read_page(sis->bdev, swap_page_sector(page), page);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+
if (trylock_page(page)) {
swap_slot_free_notify(page);
unlock_page(page);
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists