| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <6cb72b48-5244-9faf-a9e5-67858c732b83@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:39:24 +0530
From: kajoljain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
"Paul A. Clarke" <pc@...ibm.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/19] perf metric: Add support to reuse metric
On 7/20/20 12:52 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 12:14:00PM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/19/20 11:43 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>> hi,
>>> this patchset is adding the support to reused metric in
>>> another metric.
>>>
>>> For example, to define IPC by using CPI with change like:
>>>
>>> {
>>> "BriefDescription": "Instructions Per Cycle (per Logical Processor)",
>>> - "MetricExpr": "INST_RETIRED.ANY / CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD",
>>> + "MetricExpr": "1/CPI",
>>> "MetricGroup": "TopDownL1",
>>> "MetricName": "IPC"
>>> },
>>>
>>> I won't be able to find all the possible places we could
>>> use this at, so I wonder you guys (who was asking for this)
>>> would try it and come up with comments if there's something
>>> missing or we could already use it at some places.
>>>
>>> It's based on Arnaldo's tmp.perf/core.
>>>
>>> v3 changes:
>>> - added some acks
>>> - some patches got merged
>>> - added missing zalloc include [John Garry]
>>> - added ids array outside the egroup object [Ian]
>>> - removed wrong m->has_constraint assignment [Ian]
>>> - renamed 'list' to 'metric_list' [Ian]
>>> - fixed group metric and added test for it [Paul A. Clarke]
>>> - fixed memory leak [Arnaldo]
>>> - using lowercase keys for metrics in hashmap, because jevents
>>> converts metric_expr to lowercase
>>>
>>> Also available in here:
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git
>>> perf/metric
>>>
>>
>> Hi Jiri,
>> I am trying to review these patches and also test it in power box. I am testing your `perf/metric` branch.
>> With your current patches,some of hv-24x7 events not giving appropriate result
>> while doing "--metric-only" command. I can't see corresponding output for all chips.
>
> hi,
> is that just for --metric-only option?
Hi Jiri,
So basically, this issue is for both with/without metric-only option. Without metric-only option,
I am not able to see aggregate result for other chips.
This is with upstream kernel:
command# ./perf stat -M PowerBUS_Frequency -C 0 -I 1000
# time counts unit events
1.000076370 7,807,494 hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=0/ # 2.0 GHz PowerBUS_Frequency_0
1.000076370 7,807,456 hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=1/ # 2.0 GHz PowerBUS_Frequency_1
2.000259226 7,807,490 hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=0/ # 2.0 GHz PowerBUS_Frequency_0
2.000259226 7,799,691 hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=1/ # 1.9 GHz PowerBUS_Frequency_1
^C 2.745238246 5,816,562 hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=0/ # 1.5 GHz PowerBUS_Frequency_0
2.745238246 5,816,580 hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=1/ # 1.5 GHz PowerBUS_Frequency_1
Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':
21,431,546 hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=0/ # 5.4 GHz PowerBUS_Frequency_0
21,423,727 hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=1/ # 5.4 GHz PowerBUS_Frequency_1
This is with your perf/metric branch:
command# ./perf stat -M PowerBUS_Frequency -C 0 -I 1000
assertion failed at util/metricgroup.c:709
# time counts unit events
1.000054545 7,807,505 hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=0/ # 2.0 GHz PowerBUS_Frequency_0
1.000054545 7,807,485 hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=1/
2.000232761 7,807,500 hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=0/ # 2.0 GHz PowerBUS_Frequency_0
2.000232761 7,807,478 hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=1/
3.000363762 7,799,665 hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=0/ # 1.9 GHz PowerBUS_Frequency_0
3.000363762 7,807,502 hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=1/
^C 3.259418599 2,022,150 hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=0/ # 0.5 GHz PowerBUS_Frequency_0
3.259418599 2,022,164 hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=1/
Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':
25,436,820 hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=0/ # 6.4 GHz PowerBUS_Frequency_0
25,444,629 hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=1/
3.259505529 seconds time elapsed
Thanks,
Kajol Jain
>
>>
>> This is output on power9 machine:
>>
>> Without your patches on upstream kernel:
>>
>> command# ./perf stat --metric-only -M PowerBUS_Frequency -I 1000 -C 0
>> # time GHz PowerBUS_Frequency_0 GHz PowerBUS_Frequency_1
>> 1.000073877 2.0 2.0
>> 2.000240551 2.0 1.9
>> ^C 2.452590532 0.9 0.9
>>
>> Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':
>>
>> 4.8 4.8
>>
>> 2.452654834 seconds time elapsed
>>
>> With your patches on perf/metric branch:
>>
>> command# ./perf stat --metric-only -M PowerBUS_Frequency -I 1000 -C 0
>> assertion failed at util/metricgroup.c:709
>> # time GHz PowerBUS_Frequency_0
>> 1.000073875 2.0
>> 2.000380706 2.0
>> ^C 2.658962182 1.3
>>
>> Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':
>>
>> 5.2
>>
>> Please let me know, if I am missing something.
>
> hum, I'll need to add test for metric with hv-24x7 events
>
> thanks,
> jirka
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists