linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: rn5t618: Make restart handler atomic safe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200720081106.maraj6atkot5dbdf@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 10:11:06 +0200
From:   Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
To:     Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
Cc:     lee.jones@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        j.neuschaefer@....net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: rn5t618: Make restart handler atomic safe

Hi Andreas,

On 20-07-18 17:47, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> The restart handler is executed during the shutdown phase which is
> atomic/irq-less. The i2c framework supports atomic transfers since
> commit 63b96983a5dd ("i2c: core: introduce callbacks for atomic
> transfers") to address this use case. Using i2c regmap in that
> situation is not allowed:

Nice catch. I had the same issue with a DA9062 device. I have oen minor
nit, pls see inline.

> [  165.177465] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
> [  165.181479] 5.8.0-rc3-00003-g0e9088558027-dirty #11 Not tainted
> [  165.187400] -----------------------------
> [  165.191410] systemd-shutdow/1 is trying to lock:
> [  165.196030] d85b4438 (rn5t618:170:(&rn5t618_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regmap_update_bits_base+0x30/0x70
> [  165.206573] other info that might help us debug this:
> [  165.211625] context-{4:4}
> [  165.214248] 2 locks held by systemd-shutdow/1:
> [  165.218691]  #0: c131c47c (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __do_sys_reboot+0x90/0x204
> [  165.227405]  #1: c131efb4 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x0/0x118
> [  165.236288] stack backtrace:
> [  165.239174] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd-shutdow Not tainted 5.8.0-rc3-00003-g0e9088558027-dirty #11
> [  165.248220] Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 SoloLite (Device Tree)
> [  165.254330] [<c0112110>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010bfa0>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> [  165.262084] [<c010bfa0>] (show_stack) from [<c058093c>] (dump_stack+0xe8/0x120)
> [  165.269407] [<c058093c>] (dump_stack) from [<c01835a4>] (__lock_acquire+0x81c/0x2ca0)
> [  165.277246] [<c01835a4>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c0186344>] (lock_acquire+0xe4/0x490)
> [  165.285090] [<c0186344>] (lock_acquire) from [<c0c98638>] (__mutex_lock+0x74/0x954)
> [  165.292756] [<c0c98638>] (__mutex_lock) from [<c0c98f34>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24)
> [  165.300769] [<c0c98f34>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<c07593ec>] (regmap_update_bits_base+0x30/0x70)
> [  165.309741] [<c07593ec>] (regmap_update_bits_base) from [<c076b838>] (rn5t618_trigger_poweroff_sequence+0x34/0x64)
> [  165.320097] [<c076b838>] (rn5t618_trigger_poweroff_sequence) from [<c076b874>] (rn5t618_restart+0xc/0x2c)
> [  165.329669] [<c076b874>] (rn5t618_restart) from [<c01514f8>] (notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x80)
> [  165.338113] [<c01514f8>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c01516a8>] (__atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x70/0x118)
> [  165.347770] [<c01516a8>] (__atomic_notifier_call_chain) from [<c0151768>] (atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x18/0x20)
> [  165.357949] [<c0151768>] (atomic_notifier_call_chain) from [<c010a828>] (machine_restart+0x68/0x80)
> [  165.367001] [<c010a828>] (machine_restart) from [<c0153224>] (__do_sys_reboot+0x11c/0x204)
> [  165.375272] [<c0153224>] (__do_sys_reboot) from [<c0100080>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28)
> [  165.383364] Exception stack(0xd80a5fa8 to 0xd80a5ff0)
> [  165.388420] 5fa0:                   00406948 00000000 fee1dead 28121969 01234567 73299b00
> [  165.396602] 5fc0: 00406948 00000000 00000000 00000058 be91abc8 00000000 be91ab60 004056f8
> [  165.404781] 5fe0: 00000058 be91aabc b6ed4d45 b6e56746
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c
> index 6b37dd479d71..2ef61b55cd4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip rc5t619_irq_chip = {
>  	.mask_invert = true,
>  };
>  
> -static struct rn5t618 *rn5t618_pm_power_off;
> +static struct i2c_client *rn5t618_pm_power_off;
>  static struct notifier_block rn5t618_restart_handler;
>  
>  static int rn5t618_irq_init(struct rn5t618 *rn5t618)
> @@ -114,13 +114,37 @@ static int rn5t618_irq_init(struct rn5t618 *rn5t618)
>  
>  static void rn5t618_trigger_poweroff_sequence(bool repower)
>  {
> +	int ret;
> +
>  	/* disable automatic repower-on */
> -	regmap_update_bits(rn5t618_pm_power_off->regmap, RN5T618_REPCNT,
> -			   RN5T618_REPCNT_REPWRON,
> -			   repower ? RN5T618_REPCNT_REPWRON : 0);
> -	/* start power-off sequence */

I would keep both comments.

Regards,
  Marco