linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 11/15] vfio/type1: Allow invalidating first-level/stage IOMMU cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3b44dc59-cd78-2b72-965e-2f169cacdade@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:41:47 +0200
From:   Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>
To:     Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
        baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, joro@...tes.org
Cc:     kevin.tian@...el.com, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
        ashok.raj@...el.com, jun.j.tian@...el.com, yi.y.sun@...el.com,
        jean-philippe@...aro.org, peterx@...hat.com, hao.wu@...el.com,
        stefanha@...il.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/15] vfio/type1: Allow invalidating first-level/stage
 IOMMU cache

Yi,

On 7/12/20 1:21 PM, Liu Yi L wrote:
> This patch provides an interface allowing the userspace to invalidate
> IOMMU cache for first-level page table. It is required when the first
> level IOMMU page table is not managed by the host kernel in the nested
> translation setup.
> 
> Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>
> CC: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
> Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
> Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> *) rename from "vfio/type1: Flush stage-1 IOMMU cache for nesting type"
> *) rename vfio_cache_inv_fn() to vfio_dev_cache_invalidate_fn()
> *) vfio_dev_cache_inv_fn() always successful
> *) remove VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE, and reuse VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h       |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index f0f21ff..960cc59 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -3073,6 +3073,53 @@ static long vfio_iommu_handle_pgtbl_op(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int vfio_dev_cache_invalidate_fn(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct domain_capsule *dc = (struct domain_capsule *)data;
> +	unsigned long arg = *(unsigned long *)dc->data;
> +
> +	iommu_cache_invalidate(dc->domain, dev, (void __user *)arg);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static long vfio_iommu_invalidate_cache(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> +					unsigned long arg)
> +{
> +	struct domain_capsule dc = { .data = &arg };
> +	struct vfio_group *group;
> +	struct vfio_domain *domain;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	struct iommu_nesting_info *info;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> +	/*
> +	 * Cache invalidation is required for any nesting IOMMU,
> +	 * so no need to check system-wide PASID support.
> +	 */
> +	info = iommu->nesting_info;
> +	if (!info || !(info->features & IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_CACHE_INVLD)) {
> +		ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +	}
> +
> +	group = vfio_find_nesting_group(iommu);
so I see you reuse it here. But still wondering if you cant't directly
set dc.domain and dc.group group below using list_firt_entry?
> +	if (!group) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +	}
> +
> +	domain = list_first_entry(&iommu->domain_list,
> +				  struct vfio_domain, next);
> +	dc.group = group;
> +	dc.domain = domain->domain;
> +	iommu_group_for_each_dev(group->iommu_group, &dc,
> +				 vfio_dev_cache_invalidate_fn);
> +
> +out_unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static long vfio_iommu_type1_nesting_op(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  					unsigned long arg)
>  {
> @@ -3095,6 +3142,9 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_nesting_op(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  	case VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP_UNBIND_PGTBL:
>  		ret = vfio_iommu_handle_pgtbl_op(iommu, false, arg + minsz);
>  		break;
> +	case VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP_CACHE_INVLD:
> +		ret = vfio_iommu_invalidate_cache(iommu, arg + minsz);
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>  	}
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index a8ad786..845a5800 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -1225,6 +1225,8 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request {
>   * +-----------------+-----------------------------------------------+
>   * | UNBIND_PGTBL    |      struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data            |
>   * +-----------------+-----------------------------------------------+
> + * | CACHE_INVLD     |      struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info       |
> + * +-----------------+-----------------------------------------------+
>   *
>   * returns: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
>   */
> @@ -1237,6 +1239,7 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_nesting_op {
>  
>  #define VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP_BIND_PGTBL	(0)
>  #define VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP_UNBIND_PGTBL	(1)
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP_CACHE_INVLD	(2)
>  
>  #define VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP		_IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 19)
>  
> 
Otherwise looks good to me

Thanks

Eric