[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA+D8AM9S6UThwyM2vWcXBzysY+3EgnzxToyk4kQ4e9rs3ch1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 18:34:10 +0800
From: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>
To: Arnaud Ferraris <arnaud.ferraris@...labora.com>
Cc: Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>,
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] ASoC: fsl_asrc: make sure the input and output
clocks are different
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 6:40 PM Arnaud Ferraris
<arnaud.ferraris@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> The current clock selection algorithm might select the same clock for
> both input and output when, for instance, the output sample rate is a
> multiple of the input rate.
>
> In that case, both selectable clocks will be multiples of both the input
> and output sample rates, and therefore the first of these clocks will be
> selected for both input and output, leading to miscalculation of the
> dividers for either the input or output side.
>
> Example:
> Input uses clock A (512kHz) and has a sample rate of 8kHz
> Output uses clock B (1024kHz) and has a sample rate of 16kHz
>
> In this case, the algorithm will select clock A for both input and
> output: the input divider will therefore be calculated properly
> (512 / 8 => 64), but the output divider's value will be only half
> the expected value (512 / 16 => 32 instead of 1024 / 16 => 64).
>
(input divider, output divider) = (64, 32) for the same clock source
(512kHz) looks no problem. could you explain more detail why
(64, 32) can't work?
> This patch makes sure it always selects distinct input and output
> clocks.
There should be no such constraint for this IP, do you have any
evidence for we should use distinct input and output clocks?
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Ferraris <arnaud.ferraris@...labora.com>
> ---
> sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
> index 02c81d2e34ad..de10c208d3c8 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
> @@ -608,8 +608,8 @@ static void fsl_asrc_select_clk(struct fsl_asrc_priv *asrc_priv,
> {
> struct fsl_asrc_pair_priv *pair_priv = pair->private;
> struct asrc_config *config = pair_priv->config;
> - int rate[2], select_clk[2]; /* Array size 2 means IN and OUT */
> - int clk_rate, clk_index;
> + int rate[2], select_clk[2], clk_index[2]; /* Array size 2 means IN and OUT */
> + int clk_rate;
> int i = 0, j = 0;
>
> rate[IN] = in_rate;
> @@ -618,11 +618,15 @@ static void fsl_asrc_select_clk(struct fsl_asrc_priv *asrc_priv,
> /* Select proper clock source for internal ratio mode */
> for (j = 0; j < 2; j++) {
> for (i = 0; i < ASRC_CLK_MAP_LEN; i++) {
> - clk_index = asrc_priv->clk_map[j][i];
> - clk_rate = clk_get_rate(asrc_priv->asrck_clk[clk_index]);
> - /* Only match a perfect clock source with no remainder */
> + clk_index[j] = asrc_priv->clk_map[j][i];
> + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(asrc_priv->asrck_clk[clk_index[j]]);
> + /*
> + * Only match a perfect clock source with no remainder
> + * and make sure the input & output clocks are different
> + */
> if (clk_rate != 0 && (clk_rate / rate[j]) <= 1024 &&
> - (clk_rate % rate[j]) == 0)
> + (clk_rate % rate[j]) == 0 &&
> + (j == 0 || clk_index[j] != clk_index[j - 1]))
> break;
> }
>
> --
> 2.27.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists