[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9379ef46-5931-5542-c424-916bb8476a92@web.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:07:53 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>, brcm80211-dev-list@...ress.com,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Wright Feng <wright.feng@...ress.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath11k: Fix memory leak in ath11k_qmi_init_service()
> When qmi_add_lookup fail, we should destroy the workqueue
Can the following wording variant be nicer for the change description?
Destroy the work queue object in an if branch
after a call of the function “qmi_add_lookup” failed.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists