linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: gpio: Honor regulator-boot-on property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGb2v65zdCfOP-vGzrVXuzRyUC1ejG5CX=dfrh9MGTuV00VgPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 20:03:06 +0800
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: gpio: Honor regulator-boot-on property

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 7:06 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 06:01:13PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>
> > Also drop support for the undocumented enable-at-boot property. This
> > property was not documented in the original commit introducing DT
> > support, nor is it now, and there are no in-tree device trees that use
> > this property.
>
> There may still be out of tree users, an ABI is an ABI.

Ok. Should I add a comment stating this should not be used in new files?
Or just leave it as it?

ChenYu