[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be74553e-24a1-5d2b-beb6-59cca1599450@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 10:07:00 +0800
From: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
<martin.petersen@...cle.com>, <john.garry@...wei.com>
CC: <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<guohanjun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: scsi_transport_sas: add missing newline when
printing 'enable' by sysfs
Hi,
On 2020/7/19 4:25, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 2020-07-17 01:44, Xiongfeng Wang wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c
>> index 182fd25..e443dee 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c
>> @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ static ssize_t do_sas_phy_enable(struct device *dev,
>> {
>> struct sas_phy *phy = transport_class_to_phy(dev);
>>
>> - return snprintf(buf, 20, "%d", phy->enabled);
>> + return snprintf(buf, 20, "%d\n", phy->enabled);
>> }
>
> For future sysfs show function patches, please use PAGE_SIZE as second
> snprintf() argument or use sprintf() instead of snprintf() because in
> this case it is clear that no output buffer overflow will happen. Using
Thanks for your advice. I will follow it in the future patches.
> any other size argument than PAGE_SIZE makes patches like the above
> harder to verify than necessary. Anyway:
>
> Reviewed-by: Bart van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Thanks,
Xiongfeng
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists