[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200720130411.GB494210@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:04:11 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 (KVM/arm64)"
<kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable v4.9 v2] arm64: entry: Place an SB sequence
following an ERET instruction
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 12:50:23PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
>
> commit 679db70801da9fda91d26caf13bf5b5ccc74e8e8 upstream
>
> Some CPUs can speculate past an ERET instruction and potentially perform
> speculative accesses to memory before processing the exception return.
> Since the register state is often controlled by a lower privilege level
> at the point of an ERET, this could potentially be used as part of a
> side-channel attack.
>
> This patch emits an SB sequence after each ERET so that speculation is
> held up on exception return.
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> [florian: Adjust hyp-entry.S to account for the label
> added change to hyp/entry.S]
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>
> - added missing hunk in hyp/entry.S per Will's feedback
What about 4.19.y and 4.14.y trees? I can't take something for 4.9.y
and then have a regression if someone moves to a newer release, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists