linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH for v5.9] RDS: Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 17:07:16 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     "Alexander A. Klimov" <grandmaster@...klimov.de>,
        santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        rds-devel@....oracle.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for v5.9] RDS: Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 07:58:48AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 07:56:26 +0300
> Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > >  Documentation/networking/rds.rst | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Why can't it be done in one mega-patch?
> > It is insane to see patch for every file/link.
> >
> > We have more than 4k files with http:// in it.
>
> Do *you* want to review that megapatch?  The number of issues that have
> come up make it clear that these patches do, indeed, need review...

Can you point me to the issues?
What can go wrong with such a simple replacement?

I can review per-folder patches if it helps.

Thanks

>
> jon