linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] i2c: busses: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b2caf3e8-7efe-96d7-045a-19a52132ca84@embeddedor.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 10:10:36 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] i2c: busses: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword

Hi,

On 7/20/20 09:59, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
> 
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 17:03:07 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with
>> the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1].
>>
>> [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd8111.c | 2 +-
>>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c    | 8 ++++----
>>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viapro.c  | 2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd8111.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd8111.c
>> index 2b14fef5bf26..34862ad3423e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd8111.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd8111.c
>> @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static s32 amd8111_access(struct i2c_adapter * adap, u16 addr,
>>  			if (status)
>>  				return status;
>>  			len = min_t(u8, len, I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX);
>> -			/* fall through */
>> +			fallthrough;
>>  		case I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_DATA:
>>  			for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>>  				status = amd_ec_read(smbus, AMD_SMB_DATA + i,
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
>> index 1fc7ae77753d..638e7f7c66cc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
>> @@ -1765,19 +1765,19 @@ static int i801_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>>  	case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_WELLSBURG_SMBUS_MS1:
>>  	case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_WELLSBURG_SMBUS_MS2:
>>  		priv->features |= FEATURE_IDF;
>> -		/* fall through */
>> +		fallthrough;
>>  	default:
>>  		priv->features |= FEATURE_BLOCK_PROC;
>>  		priv->features |= FEATURE_I2C_BLOCK_READ;
>>  		priv->features |= FEATURE_IRQ;
>> -		/* fall through */
>> +		fallthrough;
>>  	case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801DB_3:
>>  		priv->features |= FEATURE_SMBUS_PEC;
>>  		priv->features |= FEATURE_BLOCK_BUFFER;
>> -		/* fall through */
>> +		fallthrough;
>>  	case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801CA_3:
>>  		priv->features |= FEATURE_HOST_NOTIFY;
>> -		/* fall through */
>> +		fallthrough;
>>  	case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801BA_2:
>>  	case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801AB_3:
>>  	case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801AA_3:
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viapro.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viapro.c
>> index 05aa92a3fbe0..970ccdcbb889 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viapro.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viapro.c
>> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static s32 vt596_access(struct i2c_adapter *adap, u16 addr,
>>  			goto exit_unsupported;
>>  		if (read_write == I2C_SMBUS_READ)
>>  			outb_p(data->block[0], SMBHSTDAT0);
>> -		/* Fall through */
>> +		fallthrough;
>>  	case I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA:
>>  		outb_p(command, SMBHSTCMD);
>>  		if (read_write == I2C_SMBUS_WRITE) {
> 
> Looks good to me, thanks for doing that.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
> 

Thanks for this.

> However I see many occurrences in other drivers within
> drivers/i2c/busses, which are not covered by this patch:
> 
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-synquacer.c
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ibm_iic.c
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
> drivers/i2c/busses/scx200_acb.c
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-opal.c
> 
> Are they covered by another patch of yours?
> 

Yep; I have a queue of pending patches I'm about to send. :)

Thanks
--
Gustavo