lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200720152747.250050727@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 17:36:18 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 02/58] spi: spidev: fix a race between spidev_release and spidev_remove

From: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit abd42781c3d2155868821f1b947ae45bbc33330d ]

Imagine below scene, spidev is referenced after it's freed.

spidev_release()                spidev_remove()
...
                                spin_lock_irq(&spidev->spi_lock);
                                    spidev->spi = NULL;
                                spin_unlock_irq(&spidev->spi_lock);
mutex_lock(&device_list_lock);
dofree = (spidev->spi == NULL);
if (dofree)
    kfree(spidev);
mutex_unlock(&device_list_lock);
                                mutex_lock(&device_list_lock);
                                list_del(&spidev->device_entry);
                                device_destroy(spidev_class, spidev->devt);
                                clear_bit(MINOR(spidev->devt), minors);
                                if (spidev->users == 0)
                                    kfree(spidev);
                                mutex_unlock(&device_list_lock);

Fix it by resetting spidev->spi in device_list_lock's protection.

Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...il.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200618032125.4650-1-zhenzhong.duan@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spidev.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spidev.c b/drivers/spi/spidev.c
index 3709088d4d244..80beb8406f200 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spidev.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spidev.c
@@ -769,13 +769,13 @@ static int spidev_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
 {
 	struct spidev_data	*spidev = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
 
+	/* prevent new opens */
+	mutex_lock(&device_list_lock);
 	/* make sure ops on existing fds can abort cleanly */
 	spin_lock_irq(&spidev->spi_lock);
 	spidev->spi = NULL;
 	spin_unlock_irq(&spidev->spi_lock);
 
-	/* prevent new opens */
-	mutex_lock(&device_list_lock);
 	list_del(&spidev->device_entry);
 	device_destroy(spidev_class, spidev->devt);
 	clear_bit(MINOR(spidev->devt), minors);
-- 
2.25.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ