[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200721154106.GE10769@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 17:41:06 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luto@...capital.net, axboe@...nel.dk,
keescook@...omium.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
jannh@...gle.com, will@...nel.org, hch@....de, npiggin@...il.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com
Subject: [PATCH v3] mm: Fix kthread_use_mm() vs TLB invalidate
For SMP systems using IPI based TLB invalidation, looking at
current->active_mm is entirely reasonable. This then presents the
following race condition:
CPU0 CPU1
flush_tlb_mm(mm) use_mm(mm)
<send-IPI>
tsk->active_mm = mm;
<IPI>
if (tsk->active_mm == mm)
// flush TLBs
</IPI>
switch_mm(old_mm,mm,tsk);
Where it is possible the IPI flushed the TLBs for @old_mm, not @mm,
because the IPI lands before we actually switched.
Avoid this by disabling IRQs across changing ->active_mm and
switch_mm().
[ There are all sorts of reasons this might be harmless for various
architecture specific reasons, but best not leave the door open at
all. ]
Cc: stable@...nel.org
Reported-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
Sorry, I dropped the ball on this and only found it because I was
looking at the whole membarrier things vs use_mm().
kernel/kthread.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
index 1d9e2fdfd67a..7221dcbffef3 100644
--- a/kernel/kthread.c
+++ b/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -1241,13 +1241,15 @@ void kthread_use_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
WARN_ON_ONCE(tsk->mm);
task_lock(tsk);
+ local_irq_disable();
active_mm = tsk->active_mm;
if (active_mm != mm) {
mmgrab(mm);
tsk->active_mm = mm;
}
tsk->mm = mm;
- switch_mm(active_mm, mm, tsk);
+ switch_mm_irqs_off(active_mm, mm, tsk);
+ local_irq_enable();
task_unlock(tsk);
#ifdef finish_arch_post_lock_switch
finish_arch_post_lock_switch();
@@ -1276,9 +1278,11 @@ void kthread_unuse_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
task_lock(tsk);
sync_mm_rss(mm);
+ local_irq_disable();
tsk->mm = NULL;
/* active_mm is still 'mm' */
enter_lazy_tlb(mm, tsk);
+ local_irq_enable();
task_unlock(tsk);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kthread_unuse_mm);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists