linux-kernel - Re: nouveau regression with 5.7 caused by "PCI/PM: Assume ports without DLL Link Active train links in 100 ms"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dc7a592219f58f9a5df7fa7135fa3fc87d9450f0.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jul 2020 12:00:49 -0400
From:   Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        nouveau <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Patrick Volkerding <volkerdi@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: nouveau regression with 5.7 caused by "PCI/PM: Assume ports
 without DLL Link Active train links in 100 ms"

On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 18:27 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:01:55AM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > Sure thing. Also, feel free to let me know if you'd like access to one of
> > the
> > systems we saw breaking with this patch - I'm fairly sure I've got one of
> > them
> > locally at my apartment and don't mind setting up AMT/KVM/SSH
> 
> Probably no need for remote access (thanks for the offer, though). I
> attached a test patch to the bug report:
> 
>   https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208597
> 
> that tries to work it around (based on the ->pm_cap == 0). I wonder if
> anyone would have time to try it out.

Will give it a shot today and let you know the result

> 
-- 
Cheers,
	Lyude Paul (she/her)
	Software Engineer at Red Hat