lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 21 Jul 2020 12:14:07 -0400
From:   Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
To:     live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] samples/livepatch: Add README.rst disclaimer

The livepatch samples aren't very careful with respect to compiler
IPA-optimization of target kernel functions.

Add a quick disclaimer and pointer to the compiler-considerations.rst
file to warn readers.

Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
---
 samples/livepatch/README.rst | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 samples/livepatch/README.rst

diff --git a/samples/livepatch/README.rst b/samples/livepatch/README.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2f8ef945f2ac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/samples/livepatch/README.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+
+==========
+Disclaimer
+==========
+
+The livepatch sample programs were written with idealized compiler
+output in mind. That is to say that they do not consider ways in which
+optimization may transform target kernel functions.
+
+The samples present only a simple API demonstration and should not be
+considered completely safe.
+
+See the Documentation/livepatching/compiler-considerations.rst file for
+more details on compiler optimizations and how they affect livepatching.
-- 
2.21.3

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ