[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMS8qEXNh6n9SpMkPAr8cPneasPvJPELD2TZ4gxUf0byxNePbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:20:29 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, skrzynka@...radybcio.pl,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement qcom,skip-init
>The current
>focus has been on moving more of the SMMU specific bits into the arm-smmu-qcom
>implementation [1] and I think that is the right way to go.
Pardon if I overlooked something obvious, but I can't seem to find a
clean way for implementing qcom,skip-init in arm-smmu-qcom, as neither
the arm_smmu_test_smr_masks nor the probe function seem to be
alterable with arm_smmu_impl. I'm open to your ideas guys.
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists