linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement qcom,skip-init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:20:29 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, skrzynka@...radybcio.pl,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement qcom,skip-init

>The current
>focus has been on moving more of the SMMU specific bits into the arm-smmu-qcom
>implementation [1] and I think that is the right way to go.

Pardon if I overlooked something obvious, but I can't seem to find a
clean way for implementing qcom,skip-init in arm-smmu-qcom, as neither
the arm_smmu_test_smr_masks nor the probe function seem to be
alterable with arm_smmu_impl. I'm open to your ideas guys.

Konrad