lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <754118ac-0c3f-c870-eb6e-f7bc24014cfc@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:17:34 -0700
From:   Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     vkoul@...nel.org, megha.dey@...el.com, maz@...nel.org,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, rafael@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        hpa@...or.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com, jacob.jun.pan@...el.com,
        ashok.raj@...el.com, jgg@...lanox.com, yi.l.liu@...el.com,
        baolu.lu@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com, sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com,
        tony.luck@...el.com, jing.lin@...el.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        kwankhede@...dia.com, eric.auger@...hat.com, parav@...lanox.com,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, netanelg@...lanox.com, shahafs@...lanox.com,
        yan.y.zhao@...ux.intel.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        samuel.ortiz@...el.com, mona.hossain@...el.com,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 00/18] Add VFIO mediated device support and DEV-MSI
 support for the idxd driver



On 7/21/2020 9:28 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 09:02:15AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
>> v2:
> 
> "RFC" to me means "I don't really think this is mergable, so I'm
> throwing it out there."  Which implies you know it needs more work
> before others should review it as you are not comfortable with it :(
> 
> So, back-of-the-queue you go...
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Hi Greg! Yes this absolutely needs more work! I think it's in pretty good shape, 
but it has reached the point where it needs the talented eyes of reviewers from 
outside of Intel. I was really hoping to get feedback from folks like Jason 
(Thanks Jason!!) and KVM and VFIO experts like Alex, Paolo, Eric, and Kirti.

I can understand that you are quite busy and can not necessarily provide a 
detailed review at this phase. Would you prefer to be cc'd on code at this phase 
in the future? Or, should we reserve putting you on the cc for times when we 
know it's ready for merge?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ