[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200721025450.GA5678@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:54:50 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] printk: ringbuffer: support dataless records
On (20/07/20 16:07), John Ogness wrote:
>
> +/* Determine if a logical position refers to a data-less block. */
> +#define LPOS_DATALESS(lpos) ((lpos) & 1UL)
> +
[..]
> @@ -1402,7 +1396,9 @@ static int prb_read(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb, u64 seq,
> /* Copy text data. If it fails, this is a data-less record. */
> if (!copy_data(&rb->text_data_ring, &desc.text_blk_lpos, desc.info.text_len,
> r->text_buf, r->text_buf_size, line_count)) {
> - return -ENOENT;
> + /* Report an error if there should have been data. */
> + if (desc.info.text_len != 0)
> + return -ENOENT;
> }
If this is a dataless record then should copy_data() return error?
Otherwise, looks good to me
Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists