linux-kernel - Re: ioremap and dma cleanups and fixes for superh (2nd resend)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 23:20:20 -0400
From:   Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To:     John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ioremap and dma cleanups and fixes for superh (2nd resend)

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 10:53:26AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 03:42:38PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > Hi Christoph!
> > 
> > On 7/20/20 3:38 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 01:12:33AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > >> Hello!
> > >>
> > >> I have applied Christoph's full series on top of Linus' tree and I can confirm that
> > >> the kernel boots fine on my SH-7785LCR board.
> > >>
> > >> Thus, for the whole series of patches:
> > >>
> > >> Tested-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
> > > 
> > > Any chance we get the patches queue up while you're all sorting out
> > > totally independent issues?
> > 
> > I would love to buy only Rich can do that. I'm fine with your patches
> > and would much appreciate if Rich could queue them up.
> > 
> > I'm also still waiting for my patch to be queued as well.
> 
> I saw it looked like this is solved and I'm going to look at it later
> today. Thanks!

I read and replied to this from my phone this morning so I was
mistaken about the context in the above reply, but I've now queued
(push still pending after some cleanup of sequence and testing)
everything I can take from this series for linux-next. Some of the
patches seem to depend on work in other maintainers' domains that need
clarification.

Rich