[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200721050047.GA9707@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 07:00:47 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
cgroups mailinglist <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] bdi: initialize ->ra_pages in bdi_init
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 11:27:57PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 2:37 PM Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 14:07 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > What about jffs2 and blk2mtd raw block devices?
>
> I don't worry much about blk2mtd.
>
> > If my memory serves me correctly JFFS2 did not mind readahead.
>
> This covers my knowledge too.
> I fear enabling readahead on JFFS2 will cause performance issues, this
> filesystem
> is mostly used on small and slow NOR devices.
I'm going to wait for Hans for feedback on vboxsf, but in doubt I'll
ust add a prep patch or fold for this one to explicit set ra_pages to 0
with a comment then.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists