[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200721104442.GF1676612@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 12:44:42 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
vishal.l.verma@...el.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/11] driver-core: Introduce DEVICE_ATTR_ADMIN_{RO,RW}
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 03:08:07PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> A common pattern for using plain DEVICE_ATTR() instead of
> DEVICE_ATTR_RO() and DEVICE_ATTR_RW() is for attributes that want to
> limit read to only root. I.e. many users of DEVICE_ATTR() are
> specifying 0400 or 0600 for permissions.
>
> Given the expectation that CAP_SYS_ADMIN is needed to access these
> sensitive attributes add an explicit helper with the _ADMIN_ identifier
> for DEVICE_ATTR_ADMIN_{RO,RW}.
>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> ---
> include/linux/device.h | 4 ++++
> include/linux/sysfs.h | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
This is 3022c6a1b4b7 ("driver-core: Introduce
DEVICE_ATTR_ADMIN_{RO,RW}") in linux-next now, if anyone cared :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists