[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CY4PR04MB3751882A6BDF7C073D6ECF88E7780@CY4PR04MB3751.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:15:51 +0000
From: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
"open list:BLOCK LAYER" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"open list:NVM EXPRESS DRIVER" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:SCSI CDROM DRIVER" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Ajay Joshi <Ajay.Joshi@....com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
"open list:SONY MEMORYSTICK SUBSYSTEM" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>,
"open list:NETWORK BLOCK DEVICE (NBD)" <nbd@...er.debian.org>,
Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
"open list:VIRTIO CORE AND NET DRIVERS"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] block: null: use blk_is_valid_logical_block_size
On 2020/07/21 19:54, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> This slightly changes the behavier of the driver,
s/behavier/behavior
> when given invalid block size (non power of two, or below 512 bytes),
> but shoudn't matter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/null_blk_main.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/null_blk_main.c b/drivers/block/null_blk_main.c
> index 87b31f9ca362e..e4df4b903b90b 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/null_blk_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/null_blk_main.c
> @@ -1684,8 +1684,8 @@ static int null_init_tag_set(struct nullb *nullb, struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
>
> static int null_validate_conf(struct nullb_device *dev)
> {
> - dev->blocksize = round_down(dev->blocksize, 512);
> - dev->blocksize = clamp_t(unsigned int, dev->blocksize, 512, 4096);
> + if (!blk_is_valid_logical_block_size(dev->blocksize))
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> if (dev->queue_mode == NULL_Q_MQ && dev->use_per_node_hctx) {
> if (dev->submit_queues != nr_online_nodes)
> @@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@ static int __init null_init(void)
> struct nullb *nullb;
> struct nullb_device *dev;
>
> - if (g_bs > PAGE_SIZE) {
> + if (!blk_is_valid_logical_block_size(g_bs)) {
> pr_warn("invalid block size\n");
> pr_warn("defaults block size to %lu\n", PAGE_SIZE);
> g_bs = PAGE_SIZE;
Not sure if this change is OK. Shouldn't the if here be kept as is and
blk_is_valid_logical_block_size() called after it to check values lower than 4K ?
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists