[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <401aec54-ff21-7e0f-85dc-e32435df2672@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 13:29:01 +0200
From: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yu-Hsuan Hsu <yuhsuan@...omium.org>,
Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: Convert EC error
codes to Linux error codes
Hi Guenter,
Thank you for work on this. Cc'ing Gwendal as he has a deep knowledge of the EC
and their errors.
On 20/7/20 22:22, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> The EC reports a variety of error codes. Most of those, with the exception
> of EC_RES_INVALID_VERSION, are converted to -EPROTO. As result, the actual
> error code gets lost. In cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(), convert all EC errors
> to Linux error codes to report a more meaningful error to the caller to aid
> debugging.
>
> Cc: Yu-Hsuan Hsu <yuhsuan@...omium.org>
> Cc: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
> v2: No change
>
> Notes:
> I would welcome feedback on the error code translations.
> Can we do better ?
>
> -ENOTSUPP is not a recommended error code, and checkpatch complains
> about it. It is used in existing code, so I did not change it, but it
> might be worthwhile exploring if we can find a better error code to
> report "version not supported". Possible candidates might be EPROTOTYPE,
> ENOPROTOOPT, EPROTONOSUPPORT, EPFNOSUPPORT, or EAFNOSUPPORT. I don't
> see a direct match, but NFS reports -EPROTONOSUPPORT for unsupported
> protocol versions.
>
> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
> index 3e745e0fe092..10aa9e483d35 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
> @@ -543,6 +543,29 @@ int cros_ec_cmd_xfer(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(cros_ec_cmd_xfer);
>
> +static const int cros_ec_error_map[] = {
> + [EC_RES_INVALID_COMMAND] = -EOPNOTSUPP,
> + [EC_RES_ERROR] = -EIO,
nit -EREMOTEIO? To make explicit that the error is "remote" from the host.
Although -EIO seems to be more generic.
> + [EC_RES_INVALID_PARAM] = -EINVAL,
> + [EC_RES_ACCESS_DENIED] = -EACCES,
> + [EC_RES_INVALID_RESPONSE] = -EPROTO,
> + [EC_RES_INVALID_VERSION] = -ENOTSUPP,
+1 for EPROTONOSUPPORT to match with EC_RES_INVALID_VERSION
> + [EC_RES_INVALID_CHECKSUM] = -EBADMSG,
> + [EC_RES_IN_PROGRESS] = -EINPROGRESS,
> + [EC_RES_UNAVAILABLE] = -ENODATA,
> + [EC_RES_TIMEOUT] = -ETIMEDOUT,
> + [EC_RES_OVERFLOW] = -EOVERFLOW,
> + [EC_RES_INVALID_HEADER] = -EBADR,
> + [EC_RES_REQUEST_TRUNCATED] = -EBADR,
> + [EC_RES_RESPONSE_TOO_BIG] = -EFBIG,
> + [EC_RES_BUS_ERROR] = -EFAULT,
> + [EC_RES_BUSY] = -EBUSY,
Although the name matches, I'm wondering if we should use -EAGAIN instead as per
EC documentation:
EC_RES_BUSY - Up but too busy. Should retry.
hmm, however, for the audio codec, for example, this seems to have a slightly
different meaning and retry is not what we want, so let's do direct translation
and stay with -EBUSY.
> + [EC_RES_INVALID_HEADER_VERSION] = -EBADMSG,
> + [EC_RES_INVALID_HEADER_CRC] = -EBADMSG,
> + [EC_RES_INVALID_DATA_CRC] = -EBADMSG,
> + [EC_RES_DUP_UNAVAILABLE] = -ENODATA,
> +};
> +
> /**
> * cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() - Send a command to the ChromeOS EC.
> * @ec_dev: EC device.
> @@ -555,8 +578,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cros_ec_cmd_xfer);
> *
> * Return:
> * >=0 - The number of bytes transferred
> - * -ENOTSUPP - Operation not supported
> - * -EPROTO - Protocol error
> + * <0 - Linux error code
> */
> int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
> struct cros_ec_command *msg)
> @@ -566,13 +588,12 @@ int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
> ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer(ec_dev, msg);
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(ec_dev->dev, "Command xfer error (err:%d)\n", ret);
> - } else if (msg->result == EC_RES_INVALID_VERSION) {
> - dev_dbg(ec_dev->dev, "Command invalid version (err:%d)\n",
> - msg->result);
> - return -ENOTSUPP;
> } else if (msg->result != EC_RES_SUCCESS) {
> - dev_dbg(ec_dev->dev, "Command result (err: %d)\n", msg->result);
> - return -EPROTO;
> + if (msg->result < ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_error_map) && cros_ec_error_map[msg->result])
> + ret = cros_ec_error_map[msg->result];
> + else
> + ret = -EPROTO;
> + dev_dbg(ec_dev->dev, "Command result (err: %d [%d])\n", msg->result, ret);
> }
>
> return ret;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists