[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200721121752.GK4061@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:17:52 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: silence soft lockups from unlock_page
On Tue 21-07-20 07:44:07, Qian Cai wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 21, 2020, at 7:25 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Are these really important? I believe I can dig that out from the bug
> > report but I didn't really consider that important enough.
>
> Please dig them out. We have also been running those things on
> “large” powerpc as well and never saw such soft-lockups. Those
> details may give us some clues about the actual problem.
I strongly suspect this is not really relevant but just FYI this is
16Node, 11.9TB with 1536CPUs system.
> Once we
> understand the problem better, we may judge if this “hack” is
> really worth it.
I do not have access to the machine so I can only judge from the boot
log I have in hands. And from that it is pretty clear that
$ grep BUG tmp/attachment.txt | wc -l
896
$ grep BUG tmp/attachment.txt | grep "\[systemd" | wc -l
860
$ grep do_fault+0x448 tmp/attachment.txt | wc -l
860
that the boot struggles, lockups happen from udev workers and most of
them are stuck at the very same place which is unlock_page. The rest is
a part of the changelog.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists