linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 041/133] Revert "usb/ohci-platform: Fix a warning when hibernating"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200721133046.GB406581@sasha-vm>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jul 2020 09:30:46 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 041/133] Revert "usb/ohci-platform: Fix a warning
 when hibernating"

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 01:29:08PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>> > > >After some investigations, we concluded the following:
>> > > > - the issue does not exist in vanilla v5.8-rc4+
>> > > > - [bisecting shows that] the panic on v4.14.186 is caused by the lack
>> > > >   of v5.6-rc1 commit 987351e1ea7772 ("phy: core: Add consumer device
>> > > >   link support"). Getting evidence for that is easy. Reverting
>> > > >   987351e1ea7772 in vanilla leads to a similar backtrace [2].
>> > > >
>> > > >Questions:
>> > > > - Backporting 987351e1ea7772 ("phy: core: Add consumer device
>> > > >   link support") to v4.14.187 looks challenging enough, so probably not
>> > > >   worth it. Anybody to contradict this?
>> >
>> > I'm not sure about v4.14.187, but backport to v4.19 is quite simple
>> > (just ignore single non-existing file) and passes basic testing.
>> >
>> > Would that be better solution for 4.19 and newer?
>>
>> If Eugeniu could confirm that doing so on 4.19+ works for him, sure.
>
>He did:
>
>Message-ID: <20200721065054.GA8290@...i-065.adit-jv.com>
>Technically yes. Backporting 987351e1ea7772 to v4.19.x avoids the panic.
>...
>FWIW I confirm that:
>* setup [A] leads to the issue reported in [C]
>* setup [B] resolves the issue reported in [C]
>
>[A] v4.19 + 16bdc04cc98 + 1cb3b0095c3 + 79112cc3c29f
>[B] v4.19 + 16bdc04cc98 + 1cb3b0095c3 + 79112cc3c29f + 987351e1ea7
>[C] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20200709070023.GA18414@lxhi-065.adit-jv.com/

Awesome, I can queue it back for the next release.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha