linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: core: print gpio in pins debugfs file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vfb-RJToJ8s=voPQ7tCutS9tTVpiLY6CwUgMAgcDQxbkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jul 2020 17:19:05 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>
Cc:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jason Kridner <jkridner@...gleboard.org>,
        Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: core: print gpio in pins debugfs file

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 5:17 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 5:10 PM Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0200, Drew Fustini wrote:
> > > If there is a gpio range mapping for the pin, then print out the gpio
> > > chip and line index for the pin in the debugfs 'pins' file with the
> > > format: "[gpiochip-label]:line-[index] "

...

> > > pin 25 (PIN25) gpio-32-63:line-25 44e10864 00000037 pinctrl-single
> > > pin 26 (PIN26) gpio-32-63:line-26 44e10868 00000037 pinctrl-single
> > > pin 27 (PIN27) gpio-32-63:line-27 44e1086c 00000037 pinctrl-single
> > > pin 28 (PIN28) NA 44e10870 00000036 pinctrl-single
> > > pin 29 (PIN29) NA 44e10874 00000006 pinctrl-single

And would be also better to have

0:N/A

to keep both arguments in it.

> Because line is integer and label is string it is better (from parsing
> of view) to put it other way around, i.e.
>
> %u:%s, label, line
>
> ...
>
> > Apologies - I should not have put the change log in the commit message.
> > Please let me know if I should resubmit.
>
> Since the above comment, I guess it would be good.
> Thanks for doing this!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko