[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17e884b8-09d8-98a8-3890-bf506d2cdfca@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:57:56 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@...ux.ibm.com>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
mpe@...erman.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
srivatsa@...il.mit.edu, shuah@...nel.org, npiggin@...il.com,
ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, svaidy@...ux.ibm.com,
pratik.r.sampat@...il.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Selftest for cpuidle latency measurement
On 21/07/2020 14:42, Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote:
> v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/17/369
> Changelog v2-->v3
> Based on comments from Gautham R. Shenoy adding the following in the
> selftest,
> 1. Grepping modules to determine if already loaded
> 2. Wrapper to enable/disable states
> 3. Preventing any operation/test on offlined CPUs
> ---
>
> The patch series introduces a mechanism to measure wakeup latency for
> IPI and timer based interrupts
> The motivation behind this series is to find significant deviations
> behind advertised latency and resisdency values
Why do you want to measure for the timer and the IPI ? Whatever the
source of the wakeup, the exit latency remains the same, no ?
Is all this kernel-ish code really needed ?
What about using a highres periodic timer and make it expires every eg.
50ms x 2400, so it is 120 secondes and measure the deviation. Repeat the
operation for each idle states.
And in order to make it as much accurate as possible, set the program
affinity on a CPU and isolate this one by preventing other processes to
be scheduled on and migrate the interrupts on the other CPUs.
That will be all userspace code, no?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists