[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200721151657.41027-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 23:16:57 +0800
From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
To: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
CC: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -next] mtd: rawnand: pasemi: Make pasemi_device_ready() static
The sparse tool complains as follows:
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/pasemi_nand.c:71:5: warning:
symbol 'pasemi_device_ready' was not declared. Should it be static?
This function is not used outside of pasemi_nand.c, so this commit
marks it static.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/pasemi_nand.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/pasemi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/pasemi_nand.c
index d8eca8c3fdcd..81e2e667037e 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/pasemi_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/pasemi_nand.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static void pasemi_hwcontrol(struct nand_chip *chip, int cmd,
inl(lpcctl);
}
-int pasemi_device_ready(struct nand_chip *chip)
+static int pasemi_device_ready(struct nand_chip *chip)
{
return !!(inl(lpcctl) & LBICTRL_LPCCTL_NR);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists