[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whC-GKFoBGRSnTnD6VxL_J+5xs4BzEhEfyhGMcT8Mga7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:40:13 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] XArray for 5.8
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 7:11 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> XArray updates for 5.8
>
> - Fix the test suite after introduction of the local_lock
What? No.
Now you broke the actual kernel build:
In file included from ./include/linux/local_lock.h:5,
from ./include/linux/radix-tree.h:14,
from ./include/linux/idr.h:15,
from lib/idr.c:5:
./include/linux/local_lock_internal.h: In function ‘local_lock_acquire’:
./include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:41:13: error: ‘current’
undeclared (first use in this function)
41 | l->owner = current;
| ^~~~~~~
./include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:41:13: note: each undeclared
identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
How the hell did you not see this, and why did you think it was a good
idea to mess with kernel headers and make them alphabetically ordered?
Headers need to be ordered by _contents_, not by some "sort alphabetically".
Do you sort your bookcases by color and size of the book too?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists