linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] of: property: Add device link support for pinctrl-0 through pinctrl-8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJvhpghE=LR=ng-gL5ek-7LOC1CGfOx6Vr-iACu-TX_fQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jul 2020 15:09:33 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc:     Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] of: property: Add device link support for
 pinctrl-0 through pinctrl-8

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 2:13 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Add support for pinctrl-0 through pinctrl-8 explicitly instead of trying
> to add support for pinctrl-%d properties.
>
> Of all the pinctrl-* properties in dts files (20322), only 47% (9531)
> are pinctrl-%d properties. Of all the pinctrl-%d properties, 99.5%
> (9486) are made up of pinctrl-[0-2].
>
> Trying to parse all pinctrl-* properties and checking for pinctrl-%d is
> unnecessarily complicated. So, just add support for pinctrl-[0-8] for
> now. In the unlikely event we ever exceed pinctrl-8, we can come back
> and improve this.

It wasn't immediately clear from this that pinctrl-8 is the current
max you found vs. a should be enough for a while.

Pinctrl is also a bit special in that we have 100s of child nodes and
only 1 to a few actual dependencies (the pinctrl node). I assume in
the end here, it's just the pin controller node that's the dependency
rather than creating lot's of dependencies?

Rob