lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <961bc990-c815-1a19-c349-8b03065d5aab@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jul 2020 22:11:07 +0000
From:   Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To:     "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "frowand.list@...il.com" <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        "mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        "benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        "paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
        "christophe.leroy@....fr" <christophe.leroy@....fr>
CC:     "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: OF: Can't handle multiple dma-ranges with different offsets


On 22/07/20 4:19 pm, Chris Packham wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just fired up linux kernel v5.7 on a p2040 based system and I'm 
> getting the following new warning
>
> OF: Can't handle multiple dma-ranges with different offsets on 
> node(/pcie@...202000)
> OF: Can't handle multiple dma-ranges with different offsets on 
> node(/pcie@...202000)
>
> The warning itself was added in commit 9d55bebd9816 ("of/address: 
> Support multiple 'dma-ranges' entries") but I gather it's pointing out 
> something about the dts. My boards dts is based heavily on 
> p2041rdb.dts and the relevant pci2 section is identical (reproduced 
> below for reference).
>
>     pci2: pcie@...202000 {
>         reg = <0xf 0xfe202000 0 0x1000>;
>         ranges = <0x02000000 0 0xe0000000 0xc 0x40000000 0 0x20000000
>               0x01000000 0 0x00000000 0xf 0xf8020000 0 0x00010000>;
>         pcie@0 {
>             ranges = <0x02000000 0 0xe0000000
>                   0x02000000 0 0xe0000000
>                   0 0x20000000
>
>                   0x01000000 0 0x00000000
>                   0x01000000 0 0x00000000
>                   0 0x00010000>;
>         };
>     };
>
> I haven't noticed any ill effect (aside from the scary message). I'm 
> not sure if there's something missing in the dts or in the code that 
> checks the ranges. Any guidance would be appreciated.

I've also just checked the T2080RDB on v5.7.9 which shows a similar issue

OF: Can't handle multiple dma-ranges with different offsets on 
node(/pcie@...250000)
OF: Can't handle multiple dma-ranges with different offsets on 
node(/pcie@...250000)
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: Invalid size 0xfffff9 for dma-range
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: AER: enabled with IRQ 21
OF: Can't handle multiple dma-ranges with different offsets on 
node(/pcie@...270000)
OF: Can't handle multiple dma-ranges with different offsets on 
node(/pcie@...270000)
pcieport 0001:00:00.0: Invalid size 0xfffff9 for dma-range
pcieport 0001:00:00.0: AER: enabled with IRQ 23


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ