[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200722223311.GK25301@ziepe.ca>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:33:11 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...vell.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>,
Michal Kalderon <michal.kalderon@...vell.com>,
Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
Denis Bolotin <denis.bolotin@...vell.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
GR-everest-linux-l2@...vell.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 01/15] qed: reformat "qed_chain.h" a bit
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 01:10:31AM +0300, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> Reformat structs and macros definitions a bit prior to making functional
> changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...vell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kalderon <michal.kalderon@...vell.com>
> include/linux/qed/qed_chain.h | 126 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/qed/qed_chain.h b/include/linux/qed/qed_chain.h
> index 7071dc92b4e2..087073517c09 100644
> +++ b/include/linux/qed/qed_chain.h
> @@ -26,9 +26,9 @@ enum qed_chain_mode {
> };
>
> enum qed_chain_use_mode {
> - QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_PRODUCE, /* Chain starts empty */
> - QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_CONSUME, /* Chain starts full */
> - QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_CONSUME_PRODUCE, /* Chain starts empty */
> + QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_PRODUCE, /* Chain starts empty */
> + QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_CONSUME, /* Chain starts full */
> + QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_CONSUME_PRODUCE, /* Chain starts empty */
> };
>
> enum qed_chain_cnt_type {
> @@ -40,84 +40,86 @@ enum qed_chain_cnt_type {
> };
>
> struct qed_chain_next {
> - struct regpair next_phys;
> - void *next_virt;
> + struct regpair next_phys;
> + void *next_virt;
> };
I'm surprised this is considered an improvement??
I've been encouring people to go the other way, maintaining vertical alignment is
harmful to backporting..
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists