linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] smp: irq_work / smp_call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200722233031.GQ10769@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 23 Jul 2020 01:30:31 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, will@...nel.org, hch@....de,
        axboe@...nel.dk, chris@...is-wilson.co.uk, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] smp: irq_work / smp_call_function rework

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 01:51:53PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> And scftorture doesn't much like the full set of patches.  Though this
> is early enough during boot that I am not sure that scftorture had much
> chance to do any real damage.

Thanks for taking them for a spin; I've only barely boot tested them. I
figured I'd ask for feedback before sinking too much time into it.

I'll go look at the fail in the morning.