[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200722065907.GC9290@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 12:29:07 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <michaele@....ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@....ibm.com>,
Oliver OHalloran <oliveroh@....ibm.com>,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@....ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] powerpc/smp: Enable small core scheduling sooner
* Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2020-07-22 11:29:25]:
> Hello Srikar,
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 05:08:08PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > Enable small core scheduling as soon as we detect that we are in a
> > system that supports thread group. Doing so would avoid a redundant
> > check.
>
> The patch looks good to me. However, I think the commit message still
> reflect the v1 code where we were moving the functionality from
> smp_cpus_done() to init_big_cores().
>
> In this we are moving it to a helper function to collate all fixups to
> topology.
>
Right.
Thanks for pointing , will correct this.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
Powered by blists - more mailing lists