lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB5853FE6C8680BD087C7C9B408C790@VI1PR04MB5853.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jul 2020 01:13:08 +0000
From:   Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
To:     Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>
CC:     "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: imx6qp-sabresd: enable pcie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
> Sent: 2020年7月21日 16:16
> To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>; bhelgaas@...gle.com;
> shawnguo@...nel.org; festevam@...il.com
> Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>;
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> kernel@...gutronix.de
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: imx6qp-sabresd: enable pcie
> Am Dienstag, den 21.07.2020, 15:44 +0800 schrieb Richard Zhu:
> > Add one regulator, used to power up the external oscillator, and
> > enable PCIe on iMX6QP SABRESD board.
> 
> That's not the right thing to do. If there is an external oscillator, which
> requires a power supply then the oscillator should have its own clock DT
> node (it's a separate device after all) and this node needs to control the
> regulator.
> 
> This has nothing to do with the PCIe controller, which only cares about the
> clock being provided.
> 
Hi Lucas:
Thanks for your comments. 
Okay, I would integrate the regulator into one clock node later.

Best Regards
Richard Zhu

> Regards,
> Lucas
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qp-sabresd.dts | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qp-sabresd.dts
> > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qp-sabresd.dts
> > index 480e73183f6b..cd8a1f610427 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qp-sabresd.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qp-sabresd.dts
> > @@ -51,7 +51,8 @@
> >  };
> >
> >  &pcie {
> > -     status = "disabled";
> > +     vepdev-supply = <&vgen3_reg>;
> > +     status = "okay";
> >  };
> >
> >  &sata {

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ