[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200722080530.GH6132@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:05:30 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
To: Mike Stunes <mstunes@...are.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Cfir Cohen <cfir@...gle.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@...gle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Martin Radev <martin.b.radev@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 51/75] x86/sev-es: Handle MMIO events
Hmm, I have a theory ...
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 09:01:44PM +0000, Mike Stunes wrote:
> If I remove the call to probe_roms from setup_arch, or remove the calls to romchecksum from probe_roms, this kernel boots normally.
>
> Please let me know of other tests I should run or data that I can collect. Thanks!
... can you please try the attached diff?
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c
index 251d0aabc55a..e1fea7a38019 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c
@@ -389,7 +389,8 @@ static bool vc_slow_virt_to_phys(struct ghcb *ghcb, struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt,
pgd_t *pgd;
pte_t *pte;
- pgd = pgd_offset(current->active_mm, va);
+ pgd = __va(read_cr3_pa());
+ pgd = &pgd[pgd_index(va)];
pte = lookup_address_in_pgd(pgd, va, &level);
if (!pte) {
ctxt->fi.vector = X86_TRAP_PF;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists