[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200722085411.GI43129@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:54:11 +0200
From: peterz@...radead.org
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <michaele@....ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@....ibm.com>,
Oliver OHalloran <oliveroh@....ibm.com>,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@....ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] powerpc/smp: Generalize 2nd sched domain
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:48:54AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> But reading your explanation, it looks like the Linux topology setup
> could actually unravel the fused-faux-SMT8 into two independent SMT4
> parts, negating that firmware option.
Ah, it looks like that's exactly what you're doing. Nice!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists