linux-kernel - Re: nouveau regression with 5.7 caused by "PCI/PM: Assume ports without DLL Link Active train links in 100 ms"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200722092347.GB5180@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jul 2020 12:23:47 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Cc:     Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        nouveau <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Patrick Volkerding <volkerdi@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: nouveau regression with 5.7 caused by "PCI/PM: Assume ports
 without DLL Link Active train links in 100 ms"

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 02:24:19PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 12:00 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 18:27 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:01:55AM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > > Sure thing. Also, feel free to let me know if you'd like access to one
> > > > of
> > > > the
> > > > systems we saw breaking with this patch - I'm fairly sure I've got one
> > > > of
> > > > them
> > > > locally at my apartment and don't mind setting up AMT/KVM/SSH
> > > 
> > > Probably no need for remote access (thanks for the offer, though). I
> > > attached a test patch to the bug report:
> > > 
> > >   https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208597
> > > 
> > > that tries to work it around (based on the ->pm_cap == 0). I wonder if
> > > anyone would have time to try it out.
> > 
> > Will give it a shot today and let you know the result
> 
> Ahh-actually, I thought the laptop I had locally could reproduce this bug but
> that doesn't appear to be the case whoops. Karol Herbst still has access to a
> machine that can test this though, so they'll likely get to trying the patch
> today or tommorrow

OK sounds good :)